​

The increasing prominence of the concept of cognitive warfare within Euro-Atlantic security discourse, particularly in analytical and conceptual work associated with NATO, has generated a perception that a fundamentally new domain of conflict is emerging, one that targets human cognition rather than the informational environment. This policy brief advances the argument that such interpretations overstate the degree of novelty involved. While contemporary developments in artificial intelligence, data analytics, and digital communication infrastructures have significantly transformed the scale, speed, and precision of influence activities, the underlying strategic logic remains consistent with established doctrines of Information Operations and Psychological Operations.

Accordingly, cognitive warfare should be understood not as a distinct doctrinal innovation but as a manifestation of terminological drift driven by technological change and institutional dynamics. The proliferation of this concept risks generating fragmentation within policy and doctrinal frameworks, undermining coherence in Allied strategic planning. The brief therefore recommends that policymakers prioritize the modernization and integration of existing information operations doctrine, incorporating advances in cognitive science and artificial intelligence without introducing redundant conceptual categories.